Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
The majority of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, and this helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. It also assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The writer suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all Vape Pen smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to find the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the unwanted effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports concerning the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to think about the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so due to other health issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are numerous reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it holds true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are located in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the fact that all we have to do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the amount of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.